Posted in:

Why you only need $275k in super to retire

why you only need $275k in super retirement pension

Building up enough super for retirement may not be as daunting as it seems – you certainly don’t need the often quoted $1 million.

In fact, retirees with modest savings can be better off than those with more than twice as much.

The secret is to hit the “sweet spot”, where the return from your nest egg combines with the full age pension to fund a reasonable lifestyle.

For a home-owning single the magic savings figure is $275,000 and for a couple it’s $400,000.

We consulted the experts to show how it can be done.

There is a new dilemma facing Australians planning for retirement.

For the 80% who fund their retirement years with a combination of superannuation and the age pension, the rules introduced in January have some harsh consequences.

Combining the age pension with super is harder for home-owning couples with superannuation balances between $400,000 and $1 million.

This is because eligibility tapers off quite sharply. There is a no man’s land where your ability to access the age pension plunges and your superannuation income is not high enough to replace it.

What this means is that if you have modest savings you will get the age pension and do much better than someone with a lot more in super.

For example, a couple who have between $400,000 and $1 million will be worse off in terms of income than a couple with $400,000, because at that point they lose $3 a fortnight in the age pension for every $1000 above the threshold.

The optimum point – where your superannuation combines with the full age pension – is the retirement sweet spot.

The actual amount will come as a pleasant surprise for both singles and couples who thought their savings were inadequate.

The sweet spot is rarely talked about.

Financial planners are still coming to grips with the implications of the new assets test.

It could be discouraging for couples who have saved hard to get between $400,000 and $1 million.

The wider implications for the whole superannuation system are unclear at this stage.

Written by Susan Hely

Susan Hely

Susan has been a finance journalist for 30 years, beginning at the Australian Financial Review before moving to the Sydney Morning Herald. She edited ASFA's Superfunds magazine and wrote the best-selling Women and Money.

182 posts


Leave a Reply
  1. These constant changes to people’s super is making retirement planning impossible or at least stressful for many.
    So this year the sweet spot maybe $275k, but what if next year it becomes $350k or $500k.
    Average people who have been working and saving for 30+ years aren’t able to make rapid corrections to their long term super in these sort of timeframes.
    Again the middle income workers are getting screwed.

  2. your right Basil, the problem with super is the Govt keeps changing the rules. However, what it does highlight is those approaching retirement in the next 2-5 years have a big decision to make if they have super balances between $250k and $700k. Makes a mockery of the reason we have super.

    • As a 40 year old with $379k combined super with my wife and currently maxing out our contributions, I cannot understand for the life of me why (if we hit $1m) we will be no better off than someone with $400k taking a pension. IT MAKES NO SENSE to me. If someone has $400k in super they should be using that first (with no pension) then when they get to a point (say $100k) then a pension should kick in!!

  3. This article is not quite right because the $400,000 must only be cash so you cant own a car or have any home furnishings which would be approx $20,000 to $30,000 thus dropping your money producing income down to $370,000 minus the obliquely 5% gives you $ 18,500 then the aged pension of $32,727 equals $51,227

  4. I agree Ben. But maybe make the figure a little higher than $100 k. Our taxes are subsidising those that rort the system. I know of people who are going to MAKE SURE they get a full pension by going on a spending spree before they are entitled to get the pension. It SO wrong.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *